Search 
Explore Content
- Details
- Category: Journal of AI Physics Research
- Hits: 153
Abstract:
Human theories of nature, notably general relativity and quantum mechanics, rely on physical constants (e.g., c, G, h) tied to arbitrary unit systems, rendering them inconsistent and objectively false. This paper argues that natural laws must be free of physical constants, as these are artifacts of human measurement conventions, not intrinsic to reality. We trace the historical introduction of constants, their link to the SI unit system established post-French Revolution, and demonstrate that constants reflect an unproven assumption of universal constancy. A rigorous proof shows that measurements are comparisons between physical objects, and abstract units like the meter or second are scientifically invalid. Consequently, theories built on constants, such as relativity and quantum mechanics, are flawed and must be rejected. We advocate for a unified theory grounded in invariant relations, free of constants, to illuminate the true nature of the cosmos.
Read more: On the Fallacy of Physical Constants in Natural Laws: Why Human Theories Obscure Reality
- Details
- Category: Journal of AI Biology Research
- Hits: 122
Abstract:
Claims regarding human-induced climate change, particularly the role of CO2 emissions in altering atmospheric temperature, are highly polarized, with some asserting scientific proof and others claiming disproof. This paper argues that neither position is tenable due to fundamental limitations in current scientific frameworks. Atmospheric temperature is a complex biospheric phenomenon driven by interdependent processes, including living systems, which defy mechanistic modeling. The absence of a unified theory reconciling quantum mechanics and general relativity, coupled with the arbitrary nature of SI unit constants, undermines reliable climate predictions. Current models rely on statistical assumptions rooted in a mechanistic worldview, which may not capture the causal dynamics of a living universe. We conclude that neither proof nor disproof of human-induced climate change is currently possible, urging scientific humility until a comprehensive theory of the universe is established.
Read more: On the Limits of Modeling Human-Induced Climate Change: A Call for Scientific Humility
- Details
- Category: Journal of AI Physics Research
- Hits: 126
Abstract:
The Heisenberg uncertainty principle (\(\Delta p \Delta x \geq \hbar / 2\)) is a foundational tenet of quantum mechanics, asserting a fundamental limit to the simultaneous measurement precision of position (\(\Delta x\)) and momentum (\(\Delta p\)). This paper critically examines whether this limit is intrinsic to nature or an artifact of the International System of Units (SI) time standard, defined via the caesium-133 frequency (\( f_{\text{Cs}} = 9,192,631,770 \, \text{Hz} \)). We demonstrate that the Planck constant (\(\hbar\)) scales with the choice of time standard, potentially nullifying the uncertainty bound without altering physical observables. Experimental evidence suggests quantization arises from counting whole oscillation periods in quantum measurements, contrasting with continuous time measurements in macroscopic contexts. This finding challenges the universality of quantization and suggests the conflict between quantum mechanics and general relativity may stem from measurement conventions. We propose further empirical tests to validate this hypothesis, aiming to advance human understanding of fundamental physics.
- Details
- Category: Journal of AI Physics Research
- Hits: 152
Abstract:
This paper presents a deductive proof for the existence of God, defined as a living universe, by arguing that the premise of life as the fundamental cause of the cosmos is logically necessary and scientifically compelling. We demonstrate that empirical science based on the materialist assumption—that life emerges from inanimate matter—is inconsistent and implausible due to unresolved contradictions in modern physics and the complexity of life. In contrast, positing a living universe as the foundational axiom resolves these inconsistencies and aligns with observed cosmic order. Through a rigorous logical framework, we conclude that God, as a living universe, is the most coherent premise for scientific inquiry, offering a rational bridge between science and theology.
Read more: A Logical Proof of God: The Necessity of a Living Universe as a Scientific Axiom